Joe Netsfan's Blog

The Olympic Roundup

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:41:00 +0000

OK, Netsfans, now it gets interesting as the Olympic basketball tournament gets to the medal round. Does anyone really expect the Redeem Team to lose to anyone?

The only real interest of note around these parts is the play of Nets newbie Yi Jianlian. In a word, it's been mediocre at best, and at times pathetic. He's young, it's a ton of pressure, and he's been playing basketball for Team China, so you could understand his almost complete lack of grace in the tourney. But what does this mean for the Nets?

Probably not a helluva lot. Unless you are one of those few who think that Yi will light up the NBA (and the Izod, or whatever it's called this year), what difference will it make if he struggles in the Olympics? We'd like to think this experience will make him a better player, and it may yet, it's just not going to translate to much in the Nets' 2008 - 2009 season.

Hopefully, you can accept that.

We get an entire season to see if this ploy works out, this salary dump to rid themselves of Richard Jefferson and invest in a younger, taller, much more Asian forward who can sell tickets and hold cap space for 2010. Sure, the Nets are hoping the Asian population buys every ticket in the arena so they can focus on moving to Brooklyn without having to declare bankruptcy, so what else matters?

The play on the court, that's what.

Like the Olympics, there's going to a lot of USA - Angola type matchups, I'm afraid. Vince Carter jacking 25 shots a night, Devin Harris driving and dishing (to whom, we wonder), and frankly, anything else they can scrape together. Keyon Dooling and Bobby Simmons will each have to score 15 points a game at this rate.

But at least the vaunted rookies should hopefully get some seasoning.

Sit back, relax, enjoy the Olympics and the expected domination by LeBron, Kobe, JKidd and co. It's the last look you're likely to get at a championship calibre team until 2010.

-Joe

Games Without Frontiers

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:30:00 +0000

So as the world takes a pause from its troubles and strife and heads to China for the Olympics, let us take a moment and contemplate the NBA as of August 2, 2008.

There has been a lot of retooling around the league, to be expected in the annual chase to catch up to the latest thinking on how to win a championship - this time it's defense, 3 superstars, and the "right" role players. Of course, some of those role players have taken themselves to the Euroleagues or other places beyond, so it might be a bit more difficult for teams to find the right 10th, 11th, or 12th man. The money grab isn't exactly troubling, at least not until one of the big NBA stars decides to cash a $40 million per year check at the expense of some rich Russian team owner.

Many of the world's finest players will be on display at the Olympics, including our own Yi Jianlian, part of the home contingent. So too is Jason Kidd, the ex-Net and world beater (no pun intended) who still has an undefeated Olympic record, though he should be turning over the keys to Chris Paul any moment now. The USA squad, led by LeBron James and Kobe Bryant, looks pretty motivated, judging by the beatings they've put on teams in the pre-season so far.

Back closer to home, we continue to ponder this new-look Net squad, and the pieces that remain after losing Nenad Krstic to Russia. It has all the makings of a team in transition, one whose success will depend entirely on the whole being better than the sum of its parts. Yes, we're worried about scoring, shooting, and right now, even defense, but if these guys can put out maximum effort and get strong coaching, they could surprise, we suppose.

Of course, it'll come down to coaching, since the veteran quotient shrunk dramatically in the off-season. Two new coaches climb aboard - classic NBA overachiever Doug Overton and NBA washout Roy Rogers (hold off on the names till we play the name game). Plus, it appears Jim Sann may have a bigger role on the coaching staff as well, with holdovers Tom Barrise and lead assistant Brian Hill supplying the consistency.

But it will come down to head coach Lawrence Frank and his ability to whip together not only the new coaching staff, but all the new players as well. Since East Rutherford has become the international house of basketball players, will there be any large cultural adjustment needed that the coaching staff will have to smooth over? After all, one of the biggest off-season additions was Yi, who finds himself in the world's largest media market (even though the Nets might as well be playing in Siberia now that Jason Kidd and Richard Jefferson are gone) and all the accompanying baggage that will follow. Can he perform at a high level under this coaching staff and the glare of bright lights (plus the knowledge of Netsfans that he was traded for Richard Jefferson, a local fan favorite?).

Right now the roster is unbalanced, and the more I review it, the more afraid I become. Too many front line players, not enough guards or shooters, and my word how about another point guard? A trade will likely have to follow, but who's buying what the Nets want to sell? So far, according to Al Iannazone, no one is interested in the two Net frontliners they'd like to be without, Stromile Swift and Sean Williams. Why you would give up on an athletic freak like Williams is beyond me, but again, if he's one of those guys the coaching staff deems will "never get it", then I guess it makes sense. Not having a true position doesn't help either. So if the Nets can rid themselves of at least one of those two, they could be forced to deal a player they'd rather keep, like one of the rookies or other youngsters who might have value. That wouldn't be optimal.

Instead Netsfans should get used to Vince Carter and Devin Harris at the guards, Yi and Bobby Simmons (or Eddie Najera) at the forwards, and either Josh Boone or Brook Lopez at center. Not exactly awe inspiring, but the bench is at least better than last year (with the exception of shooter). Keyon Dooling will back up both Harris and Carter, so he's in the rotation. But who else will be a regular contributor? Najera (or Simmons) for certain - Jarvis Hayes because he fills a definite role off the bench (shooter) - and at least one or two more big men. Figure Lopez (if he doesn't start) and fellow rookies Ryan Anderson and Chris Douglas Roberts get time in and out of the lineup (rather than regular, steady time so they can develop). After that? With the way Frank operates, your guess is as good as mine.

Celebrate the Olympics, and the US Olympic team (like him or hate him, you can't root against Kidd in this situation), and understand that the NBA will likely take a giant pause over the next two weeks. Things probably won't get interesting again (if they do at all) until late August or September, and then before you know it, the Nets will be right back in training camp.

Let's hope there's more to the story...

-Joe

Russian Winters

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:11:00 +0000

Maybe the Nets are considering a farm team in Russia?

For the second time in a few weeks, it appears a Net will ply his trade in Russia intstead of hanging around the NBA. First it was Boki Nachbar, now it appears that Nenad Krstic ("we want him back, we swear") is leaving for more money and less pressure out in Russia. Good for him, we say.

Since the Nets have a glut of players up front, why not see if he can round back into form out in Russia? It doesn't cost the Nets anything, the retain his NBA rights, and for all we know at this time next year (Krstic has an opt out after the season to return to the NBA), the Nets are once again lacking depth up front and Krstic steps right back into the rotation. Of course, if he can't get his most formidable skills on the court back, well, Trader Rod was once again smart.

The Nets were hoping to do a sign-and-trade with another NBA team to get something back for Krstic, but this works just as well.

Frankly, even with the shaky comeback from the knee surgery, he was one of the Nets' more known commodities. Now what happens if all the depth up front doesn't quite pan out? If Brook Lopez isn't ready for prime time? If Sean Williams (if the Nets hold on to him) doesn't show any more maturity? If Josh Boone regresses? You get the point.

We'll miss Nenad - he was a godsend just a few short years ago when the Nets were thinner than thin up front, he was a rookie, and we expected absolutely nothing but 12th man status, and Nenad carried the frontliners? It all ended too quickly back in December 2006, for him as well as for us.

So the changes continue in Netsland, the Russians get a bonifide question mark, and we're not nearly done seeing all the new concepts in the NBA circa 2008. Who would have thought that the Euro would be the drawing card to lure talent away from the NBA?

- Joe

Marcus of Golden State

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:40:00 +0000

Great fit - the no defense Warriors and the no defense Marcus Williams.

So, the Nets get a conditional first round pick (in 2011, 2012 or 2013, or 2 second rounders...interesting how complex this stuff gets) back for a guy who was clearly not in favor in Netsland (and with Lawrence Frank).

Shame, since he appeared to have all the talent in the world, but as I said before, no idea how to harness it. A questionable work ethic combined with an allergy to defense doomed him in the eyes of management.

Remember a few short off-seasons ago when it appeared the Nets got a steal and the heir apparent to Jason Kidd? Well, now you have Devin Harris and Keyon Dooling as your point guards, and Marcus is off to score a million and one points with the Warriors. Kind of makes you a bit nervous as to how he'll turn out under someone else's watch, since he does have the ability to do well in the all offense all the time game the Warriors play.

But, that leaves the Nets with 15 guaranteed contracts, and the likelihood that one or more current Nets will also be leaving the building (somehow, I don't think Nenad Krstic will be on the opening roster, and Mo Ager probably shouldn't be making firm plans for Christmas 2008 in NJ...). The glut of fowards also needs resolution, because there are just too many players to spread the playing time around for.

That's going to be the big challenge for Lawrence Frank - fielding a competitive though young team, and keeping them in games, without having a 12 or 13 man rotation. We all know Lawrence would like an 8 or 9 man rotation, so there are an awful lot of players who could be on the outside looking in.

Problems for another day. Marcus, we hardly knew ye, and though we were teased by your potential only occasionally, we wish you nothing but luck in the Western Conference.

-Joe

Taking Shape

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:35:00 +0000

Wow, did you ever think you'd see a Net team under Bruce Ratner (motto: I ain't losing $40 mill a year forever) have 16 guaranteed contracts?

Well, that's what the Nets will have after they do a sign and trade for Keyon Dooling, who's been the object of the Nets affections for years.

A complete turnover of the roster since the start of last season leaves the Nets a very interesting team right now. Dooling is a young vet who can add some legs, some defense, and a turn at the point if necessary, which probably leaves young Marcus Williams packing his backs for points elsewhere (hey, is Memphis still collecting point guards?). A shame about poor Marcus, who appeared to have a world of talent but doesn't have a clue as to how best to harness it.

So with Dooling backing up Carter and Harris, and a logjam at the center and forward spots, this Nets team is taking shape and looking very much like a bit more than a rag tag team of definite losers. If Brook Lopez can learn the NBA game on the fly, if Chris Douglas Roberts can add a spark off the bench, and if the Nets can get some offense from a bunch of these role players, well, then maybe the Nets won't be a challenged as we had thought just a week or so ago.

And with Carter to (hopefully) sell some tickets, the rookies, Harris and a few others, it might not be the worst game in town (think maybe the Knicks will still play that role in the NYC area?).

Of course, it all comes down to Lawrence Frank and the coaching staff to get everyone to buy in, put together a rotation that capitalizes on strength, and hopefully go against type and give the rookies some PT so that they can develop. That might be the biggest challenge facing these New Jersey Nets - getting the coach to trust his youngsters and give them the PT they need to develop. I for one would rather watch a 35 win team that hustles and learns and grows throughout the season than a 40 win team that's flat out boring and going nowhere fast.

The next trick is to see who goes, and how fast - (no the Nets won't keep 16 guaranteed contracts, or even 15 for that matter) Nenad Krstic? Marcus? Sean Williams? Stromile Swift? Josh Boone or Mo Ager or the Keith Van Horn contract?

Put your money on Marcus and Nenad, unfortunately. The Nets likely want to have no more than 14 guaranteed contracts, and you know the 3 rookies, Carter, Harris, Najera, Hayes and Dooling are sticking around, so that makes 8 potential players that could be had in a trade. There's some value in Swift (expiring contract at season's end), Ager (same), Van Horn's contract, and I would guess that the Williams' boys value has declined somewhat and the bottom feeders will be out in force trying to catch Rod at a weak moment. But as has always been the case, no one will get the better of Rod.

Stay tuned - things continue to get interesting...

-Joe

International Flavor, But What's To Savor?

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:56:00 +0000

Oh, dear me...it looks like the Nets are going to fill their roster with "serviceable veterans" after the signings of Eddie Najera and Jarvis Hayes brings the roster to 15. Seems like about 13 of those 15 are forwards or centers, so perhaps the plan by Thorn and Vanderweghe is to corner the market on big men, and hope that some team needs what the Nets have and will want to deal with NJ.

Or not, because frankly, there is no way this can be over (and Thorn even said so himself).

I'm a bit baffled by the signing of Hayes, who has never done much in the "making an impression" department. Supposedly he can shoot, but really, is this an upgrade over Boki Nachbar (and I've read the pros and cons from everyone out there already - perhaps Thorn thought that Boki was a permanent bad back waiting to happen after last season?)? Frankly, I think not. Let's hope this guy doesn't wind up as the 14th man, because that's an awful lot of money to spend on a guy who is as inconsistent as they come.

Najera I understand. Not only is a solid front line player, good soldier and even a decent three point shooter, but he's the league's only Mexican born player, which fits right in with the Nets new motto - "hey, we may not challenge for a playoff berth, but we'll be able to market to any ethnicity in the tri-state area". Eddie's hard-nosed and frankly we don't understand why Mark Cuban didn't want him back (and seriously overpay for him) in Dallas.

So, Eddie got a 4 year deal, that puts him into the 2010 "let's sign LeBron" fantasy camp. He's likely front loaded on his contract so that he doesn't screw up the cap space, but we're still wondering if this is the best way to rebuild the team.

I guess it is if you are refusing to take large losses, but then again, if the team stinks, won't it just be harder to get fans into the Izod?

Jarvis Hayes? Ok, I'll stop repeating his name now, and accept that this may be this year's Jeff MacInnis. Wouldn't the money have been better spent on a backup combo guard like Keyon Dooling (and I am no fan of his either, but he's got to be a better signing than Hayes).

I did read some optimism over the past day about the Nets being better than anything thinks they will be. Well, until Thorn makes more changes, you can forget about that.

But, the Nets do have hope - though it's only the summer league, Brook Lopez looked like a man amongst boys in the pivot, Ryan Anderson had some moments to build on, Chris Douglas Roberts played like he had that second round chip on his shoulder, and this Jaycee Carroll guy may have found himself a home after going undrafted. Suddenly, you have to wonder if Sean Williams or Josh Boone are expendable...Williams because he doesn't have a true position and seems a bit thick in the head, and Boone because there are others on the team that might be better served in the offense.

But again, we'll see what transpires, since the Nets are thin at guard.

Let's hope the 3 rookies stick around and get some NBA tutoring from Vince Carter and others...because otherwise, there really isn't a lot to get excited for with this squad.

More thoughts coming tomorrow.

Joe

Yi Haw!

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:03:00 +0000

Well pardners, Yi is in town, and things will never be quite the same again in Netsfanland.

No, he's not an international superstar, at least not yet. But he's bringing in a media horde from the world's most populated country, and he's playing in the largest media market in the world. So, the Nets now have that going for them. Even if no one shows up at the Izod Center next season, the world's eyeballs will be watching...

Oh, we don't even want to get into the details of the wonderous press conference, where it was said that Yi is very talented and they expect big things out of him yada yada...what we want to know is, was it worth trading Richard Jefferson for him or not? Unfortuntately, that won't be proven out for awhile, and it will also largely depend on whom the Nets surround him with on the court.

And there's the Lawrence Frank factor. L Frank has never has as much talent or depth on the front line in his time here (guards and wing players ruled the day, obviously), but now he's got Brook Lopez (who went for another 22 and 8 tonight in a win over the Seattle Oklahomans...), Yi, Simmons, Josh Boone, Sean Williams, and Stromile Swift, not to mention the other rook Ryan Anderson and Trenton Hassell and possible Nenad Krstic. That's probably too much (who the hell shoots the damned ball from outside if Boki doesn't return, but it's a nice problem to have.

If they produce.

And when Yi is your best immediate hope for offense up front, well, that's trouble right there. His game needs polish, and Joe's still concerned that he doesn't want to put in the time, especially with his international Olympic commitments for China. Will he break down come February, or sooner?

Sure, the marketing will go into overdrive in Chinatown and the New York area (can't you see it now - come see the Chinese sensation from New Jersey and the Italian Stallion from New York in Danilo Gallinari), and it can't hurt when it comes to making news in the post Kidd era, but I think expectations had better not be high for the men on the court. We'll starve until 2010 and the move to Brooklyn as the youngsters learn how to play, and won't that be great for New Jersey Netsfans...

We'll have to comment more on that in the coming days, because the more I think about it, unless Thorn's got more moves up his sleeves, we're doomed to some boring, low scoring ball in New Jersey next year.

Just what Netsfans needed...

OK, we'll give it a chance today, especially if Thorn can move pieces for a Marcus Camby or someone else. But with the Sixers grabbing Elton Brand today, the division hasn't gotten any easier between the world champion Celtics, the improved Sixers and the always dangerous Raptors. More work is needed.

More to come tomorrow. Maybe we'll rank on Bobby Simmons, and talk about some of the other moves in the NBA (since the Nets appear to be striking out on their free agent hit list, with Pietrus and Mason signing elsewhere).

Joe

Who's Gonna Score?

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:36:00 +0000

Finally, back online to worry about the Nets and not where the furniture's gonna fit in the office....

Yes, Joe moved JNF HQ, and all the baggage that goes along with it. Memo to self - never have a baby and move within a month of each other...

But while JNF HQ was being prepared for moving, Joe had a lot of time to think, and adjust on the fly, as things started coming together for the Nets on draft night.

This is a very interesting, very young Nets team at the moment. This is both good and very bad.

First, let me applaud Nets management for pulling the plug on something that wasn't working, blowing things up and deciding to reach for future glory (and cap space). Though Richard Jefferson was moved, this is a good thing.

What's not so good, ok, very bad, is what this team is left with. An NBA marketing dream in Yi Jianlian in the New York area, sure, but is Bobby Simmons going to resurrect his career and suddenly throw in 20 points per night? In fact, is this Nets team going to break 70 points a game as presently configured?

Jason Kidd and Richard Jefferson have already dissed the Nets as currently configured, by the way...

With 3 Net rookies likely to make the team, and Marcus Williams, Sean Williams, Josh Boone and Mo Ager still on this team, they are certainly young. But they're also without a lot of scoring options aside from Vince Carter, especially if they can't hold on to Boki Nachbar (and don't be too sure he won't wind up in the Garden, playing for the Knicks).

So, it's good to change, but unfortunately, we Netsfans may be the ones to suffer.
No major scoring threat from Carter means you need a whole lot of contribution from Devin Harris as scoring option #2 and try to establish a consistent and regular go-to option #3 (is that Yi?). Maybe they'll play like the Jeff Van Gundy teams of old and they'll win a lot of 72 - 70 games.

Ick.

Looks like the Nets could have found a diamond in the rough as they start play in the Summer League in Orlando. Jaycee (what a dumb name) Carroll might be an interesting bench player, from all early indications. Lord knows they need someone who can shoot. And the big men down there seem to be proving themselves especially defensively, as Michael Beasley ran into a buzz saw named Sean Williams tonight even as the Nets lost. But Sean's uneven play in the first game makes you wonder where his head is at, and if he's ever going to truly get it. He should be dominating that league...

We'll keep an eye on Chris Douglas Roberts and Ryan Anderson, perhaps they may be the keys to some offense this season. Though it's hard to come in as a rookie and make nightly contributions, so that's not exactly a legitimate hope right now...

While we're here - what's with Richard Jefferson expressing surprise at being traded? How could he not know it was coming, and that the team was working hard to accomplish it? Kind of a sad exit for RJ fans (and yes, I was one of them, up to the end and even though he'd decided defense wasn't a priority...).

More thoughts coming tomorrow, as I get back into the swing of things...I would love to know if you are excited or not about the changes made so far, and if you're just dreaming of 2010 and massive cap space (and willing to wait at that...). Drop me a line if your head is there...

Joe

...And Chris Douglas Roberts, too

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:26:00 +0000

The Nets may have gotten the steal of the draft at #40, Chris Douglas Roberts of Memphis, who was expected to go in the first round.

Of course, my first paranoid reaction was, "why did he slip so far?", but a steal's a steal (just like Marcus Williams was a few years ago?).

So, the Nets get younger, they get under the cap, they change out the roster in a heartbeat (ok, I'm still not ok with Yi, but I'll let it work itself out), and likely they've seen the last of Nenad Krstic, Boki Nachbar and Gana Diop.

This is a young, young team as it stands - are we sure that Rod doesn't have something up his sleeve? Could be another painful year, Netsfans, even with Carter and Harris returning...

Overall, a good to great draft for the Nets, but we are officially in - we can say it now - rebuilding mode.

More to come, have to get the move of JNF HQ out of the way in the week ahead. Then, we'll see where we are once July 1 rolls around, who stays and who goes around the league, and start cleaning up the site for the 2008 - 2009 season.

Just think - a few more years before the Nets move to Brookly and I can get out of this gig.

Brooklyn (Brook) Lopez playing in Brooklyn? You can't make this stuff up.

-Joe

The Change Has Begun - But For The Better?

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:25:00 +0000

Wow. Rod and Kiki were serious about making a change, and not just a small one.

Richard Jefferson to the Bucks for Yi Jinlian and Bobby Simmons is about as much change as we can expect. It's not the deal that any Netsfan wants, but it's the deal nonetheless.

It certainly changes the complexion of the Nets, and now as I see the Nets have drafted Brook Lopez with the #10 pick, the Nets have gotten larger quickly. Maybe somewhat tougher, but Yi is likely not going to be confused for a tough guy any time soon.

Lopez is a good pick, the right pick considering who was left on the draft board. Will he be an immediate game-changer? Likely not. But he can most likely come in and contribute right away. And the Nets need all the help they can get, even if the help they appear to be getting is younger (Yi is only 20, and Lopez came out after his sophomore year).

The big question is - do I like the moves? Not entirely, but I think we'll have to give it a chance, or perhaps Thorn isn't done yet. I don't get why they are so high on Yi, since he never did much of anything against the Nets last season, but I guess we'll have to play it out.

Jefferson was a solid citizen who maybe regressed last year as all offense, little defense, which was exactly what the Nets DIDN'T need.

And was this a move toward the big 2010 free agent class led by LeBron? The Nets will gain flexibility with this pick since Simmons' deal is a year shorter than RJ's, but it's probably a pipe dream to think the Nets will be in the running for him.

The Nets are retooling - they had to, this team wasn't exactly scaring anyone last season - but will the trade, plus the draft picks, plus the remaining core, be enough to put the Nets back into the playoffs?

Right now, I don't see how...

The Nets second pick, #21, is just in - Ryan Anderson from California. Interesting pick for a team that is now swimming with bigs. This just begs for a trade.

A bit surprising the Nets didn't pick a shooter or slasher - guess this was a "best remaining athlete on the board" pick? Seems he's a good outside shooter, though - so maybe he's Boki's replacement (or training under Boki if he comes back)

The Nets roster now has:
C Nenad Krstic (restricted free agent I assume the Nets will pick up or trade)
C Desagana Diop (free agent - the Nets must not think he's coming back)
F/C Josh Boone (a staple last year, his growth one of the few bright spots)
F Boki Nachbar (free agent)
F Stromile Swift
F/C Sean Williams
F Trenton Hassel
F Yi Jinlian
F Bobby Simmons
F/C Brook Lopez
F Ryan Anderson

That's a lot of front liners...If Diop is gone, and maybe Boki too, it makes sense. Otherwise, there must be some dealing to come, since the first round picks get guaranteed contracts.

And looking at this, and the roster, the Nets are painfully thin at guard, with only Carter, Harris, Marcus Williams and Mo Ager on the roster right now (Armstrong DID retire, correct?).

More to come, I'm sure.

A reminder (as if you were really going to remember) - JNF will be largely silent for the next week or so as we pack up and move headquarters about a mile east.

-Joe

Caffeine Buzz

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:29:00 +0000

Now we're talking - rumors are flying, things are starting to heat up, and still there is zero consensus of what's to come on Thursday night.

All of this should work in the Nets' favor.

Teams are unsure of where the real talent is in this draft beyond #'s 1 and 2, and it sounds like even #2 Miami isn't all that in love with Michael Beasley if Chicago does the expected and takes Derrick Rose with the first pick. That's good news - more and more it looks like the Nets will find someone unexpected falling into their laps.

That is, if they don't trade up. Or trade down. Or even trade out.

Rod Thorn is fielding calls for the Nets' picks, and apparently things are starting to get interesting. Trading down with Portland for the #13th pick sounds like a real option.

And the latest word is plenty of teams covet the Nets #21 pick and so far they're not biting. Too much youth ain't a good thing, but maybe Thorn has ideas to package bodies later in the summer...that's probably too much to hope for.

In any case, this is the best part of the off-season, when the caffeine buzz finally kicks in and months of talking about everything and nothing starts to come to fruition.

I'll say it again - the Nets need to make changes, and quickly. Not just hiring Doug Overton to replace Pat Sullivan kind of changes, but big, meaningful changes. Adding 3 more rookies to the mix isn't exactly a short term growth plan, but if that's what Thorn and Vanderweghe decide, then we're in for a bit of a long season.

But I can't imagine that Rod wants to wait 3 years or more to be a good team again. I'm sure he'll come up with something before hanging it all up when the move to Brooklyn happens.

And speaking of that, it appears the last of the major legal hurdles has been cleared, since the Supreme Court refused to hear any arguments relative to the case. So, despite the heavy costs incurred to date, looks like Mr Ratner will get his wish. And we'll eventually see the Nets leave New Jersey, to the usual blanket of apathy...

Let the countdown begin...

At least to Thursday night, when the Nets world (hopefully) starts changing...

-Joe

Big Bigger Biggest

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:20:00 +0000

We're dialed in exactly 5 days before the draft, and from the looks of things, the Nets are keeping their picks at #10, 21, and 40.

Or maybe not.

Such is the life of the Nets right now - in stealth rebuilding mode, wanting to move one of their chief assets (albeit one that's overpaid) in Richard Jefferson while bringing in newer and younger blood. Holding some good draft pick spots in a draft where quality will come, but will it be at #3, #10, or even #24? It's that kind of draft - Rose and Beasley and then everyone else.

So the #10 pick will likely net quality, but is also something of a crap shoot. How do you feel about that, Netsfans? Can the Nets afford to take someone with serious upside potential but also needing 2 or 3 (or more) years to get there? Do they need to cast the waters for Antoine Wright version 2.0?

Dave D and others say the Nets have five players on their wishlist for #10, including 2 guards. The expectation is the Nets will pick Danilo Gallinari, the forward with the sweet stroke (but unathletic)from Italy if he's there at 10. Certain folks feel he could be another Dirk Nowitzki in the making, and the Nets would be fools to pass him up if he's still there at 10.

Let them be fools, I say. Will he be the second coming of Nowitzki, or Andrea Bargnani? Is that something we want?

Others on the list of five - F Joe Alexander, C Brook Lopez, G Russell Westbrook, and G Eric Gordon, if any of those folks are still on the board.

Not expected to be on the board, but with a serious man-crush by Vanderweghe and Thorn, is Kevin Love of UCLA, who isn't expected to make it past #5.

Anyone on the list excite you more than any other? Should the Nets trade up, or trade down? Or better still, package the pick for existing, established talent?

At this point, you know how I feel - move the pick, either for a better draft position in the top five or for someone who can help the Nets right away (like Elton Brand, perhaps, though he's only an example), rather than settle for Gallinari or even Lopez (and they might turn out to be fine pros, but the Nets need someone to help them win NOW, not in three years' time).

But, if the Nets don't go that way, and stay at #10, grabbing a big over a guard would be a good idea (though Westbrook intrigues, to say the least, as does OJ Mayo if by miracle he drops down).

Go big, says Joe. Of course we love Love over here at JNFHQ, but there are others on the board we'd certainly be interested in bringing in, everyone from Anthony Randolph to Mareese Spreights, and a whole bunch more. Can the Nets get quality at #21? Even better.

Of course, #21 could surely be reserved for a shooter, which the Nets seem always to be in short supply of. There isn't anyone in the draft that should be considered a lock, but there are options to pick one up (and I won't get into them here, because no one is really interested in them per se).

Go big. Do something big. Bigger. Biggest. That's my opinion on things - whether it means trading up to get some Love, or trading down to get a veteran body plus a draftee, whatever.

Hell, right now I'd even consider the muck in the papers that has Richard Jefferson going to Phoenix for Leandro Barbosa and Boris Diaw. Just because it would be doing something different. Add Love or Lopez or Darrell Arthur upfront, and it will at least begin the serious change away from the Jason Kidd era.

Face it, no one is convinced the Nets can win anything with Jefferson and Carter and a cast of role players. Might as well make the big play.

Of course, draft night always throws us a curve somewhere (like in 2002, when the Nets selected Eddie Griffin and Netsfans were for the most part despondant, then a bit confused when he was traded for 3 bodies), and there is no better time for that curve to be from the Nets.

Sure will be interesting to see what the Nets actually come up with, and who falls downward or floats upward in the draft.

More thoughts to follow, especially based on any last minute conjecture as we head into the final week.

-Joe

Chem Class

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:22:00 +0000

Well, in the slow-news Nets world, the competition has started for picking the perfect players in the upcoming draft. With the candidates slowly drifting in, it appears the Nets have their sights set on a forward with the #10 pick, bringing in the likes of Darrell Arthur, Mareesse Spreights, and DJ White and pledging to bring in anyone who is anyone in this draft.

If they keep the pick, or picks, that is.

Still too early to firm up rumors, but Kiki himself said the picks could be in play if the right offer comes around. Forget Denver and 'Melo, at least for now. Could we be looking at Elton Brand, or Rasheed Wallace (perish the thought, but he's likely out there).

In any case, one thing the Nets need to do with the young remnants left on the roster - make sure they establish some sort of chemistry for this team. The chemistry of the Nets went horribly wrong last year, and once their leader in spirit and body chucked in the towel, there was no turning back on the wasteland that things became. Kidd, for all his strengths, deserves a lot of the blame for that. But, he didn't put the roster together, either..

Let's face it, no one is Jason Kidd, and asking Devin Harris to be anything like him is just wrong. But the Nets do need players who can all play in the same style, which given that Lawrence Frank is still around, will be defense first, with a bit of a more wide-open offense with Harris at the controls.

But with 7 players on the current roster at 24 or younger, the Nets need to bring in some veterans to go with that youth (or use that youth as trade bait) to ensure the rebuilding doesn't take another 5 years. With no impact player likely coming out of the draft for the Nets (immediate impact, anyway), the Nets have to make sure they have a good mix of personnel, skills, youth vs vets, complimentary players, and all that jazz.

They also need to make sure they don't come away empty handed if trading is what they're about. Same is true for free agency.

Though it won't be a terrible thing if the Nets keep the picks, they certainly need to move some bodies and make some changes beyond that. Doubtful they can pull off a Garnett or Gasol miracle, but they need to be trying, and consider any opportunity.

How about those Celtics, speaking of KG? Up 2 - 0 against a Laker team I thought was more powerful, and unleashing the likes of Leon Powe against the Phil Jackson hate machine. Incredible, really, but these Celtics really can play some defense.

And how about Eddie House, ex-Net, winding up in nirvana, even if he's not getting all that much playing time. Not to mention former fave Brian Scalabrine, who's making $15 million over 5 years to not dress and will probably still wind up with a ring. Now that's living...

The JNF world headquarters is packing up to move locations at the end of the month, so we'll try to hang in as long as we can and keep discussing the draft and other things Nets. Draft night itself might be the last you'll hear from me for awhile, but once we're up and running in July we'll try to take a look at everything we'll likely miss over the course of the next month. Keep checking back, though, because I'll try to get posted no matter how much painting I need to do.

-Joe

Post Time, 30 Days

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Wed, 28 May 2008 02:24:00 +0000

So, no new news this week (real news, anyway) when it comes to our Nets.

The Pre-Draft camp is this week, where anyone who is a sort-of prospect (or more) will show off their skills in lovely Orlando, FL. The Nets will have the braintrust there, and since there are 3 draft picks that are in play (remember, it's #10, 21, and 40, for those of us who believe the Nets will actually use them) and a whole damned team to rebuild (and the latest skinny is the Nets will not get Gana Diop back in a uniform, and Boki Nachbar might be as little as 50/50 to return).

The Nets also are actively shopping Marcus Williams, according to Dave D, and while the news of a potential trade or more for Carmelo Anthony is out there, it hardly makes a ton of sense (rebuild your team around Allen Iverson, and his 150,000 miles on the driveshaft? I don't think so).

With all that happy news, and a constant pounding on Richard Jefferson this off-season about what a terrible player he apparently is, do you really think the Nets can take the slow road back to health by using 3 draft picks? Even if they stash one in Europe for a year or two (and look at how well that's turned out)?

Only if you think the Nets want to be players for the 2010 free agent field, which includes LeBron James.Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade, among others. And in that case, then you need to believe that the Nets will break ground this fall on the arena in Brooklyn and be playing there for the 2010 - 2011 season, which is a big stretch right now. Oh, don't get me wrong, I'm sure the Nets will ultimately break ground (especially after the laser light show that Bruce Ratner and Brett Yormark put in in NYC last week), but at this point, to count on it happening when they want it to happen is probably dubious at best.

So, in that case, what do you do? Use all 3 draft picks, sign some serviceable free agents to be named to short term contracts, and play out the string with Vince Carter as the centerpiece, Devin Harris the point guard, Richard Jefferson his running mate, and 3 rookies for the 2008 - 2009 season? It seems criminal to take that approach.

More likely, the Nets will continue to try hard to move Richard Jefferson (hint: send him to the Clips for Elton Brand, and find a way to make it work by including salaries and the #10 pick of the draft) and try to reshape the roster with free agents (not much there), trades (have to get creative) and the draft (hey, the league says if you don't get rid of the pick, you have to draft somebody...).

Think they would try to package Jefferson and the #10 (and maybe #21) pick to move up in the draft? Unless they could get to #1 or #2, I don't think so. But maybe Chicago might be a willing trade partner for someone like Ben Gordon, the shooter (albeit somewhat streaky, but what shooter isn't?) the Nets so desperately need. They don't need Jefferson, but perhaps they need another high draft pick or some of the Nets roster fodder? It's a stretch, and it may take a third team, but who knows?

It's also possible the Nets make a pick at #10, then trade it like they did in the 2001 draft (that netted Jefferson and Jason Collins) after they make a pick for someone else. You never know.

In 30 days or so, we'll find out.

The playoffs continue to be exciting in my book, tough battles in both series, and no clear cut favorite despite the hurting the Lakers put into the Spurs (who, as championship timber, did a find job of getting back to basics and whipping the Lakers on Sunday night). While I wish the Nets could field a team to go that deep into the playoffs, no complaints thus far about the caliber of either series. The best 4 teams (though not the most exciting) got the the NBA Final Four. Congrats for that...

We'll check in with more rumors, thoughts and possibilities in the next day or so.

-Joe

We're #10

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Wed, 21 May 2008 02:20:00 +0000

OK, so there wasn't any luck brought to the Nets by Jay-Z tonight in Secaucus, NJ. The pick they expected to be in, #10, is exactly where they finished. The Bulls drew the winning lotto, somehow coming from the number nine spot to get the first pick in the draft. Incredible, because of all the teams that made the lottery, the Bulls were one of the least needy of that pick. Figures.

In any case, while having the #10 pick isn't exactly a consolation prize, it's not the worst thing that could happen to a non-playoff, rebuilding team like the Nets. Given the status of this draft, where there are 2 guaranteed players at the top of the draft, then a lot of talent but no absolutely sure things, it just might make it easier for Rod and Kiki to trade the pick for an established starter or two. A top three pick you likely hang on to unless you get blown away with an offer, but a #10 pick, while nice and useful, might be better served being sent elsewhere.

After all, if you are rebuilding and you draft a project at number 10, you really haven't helped yourself if your core is Vince Carter, Richard Jefferson and Devin Harris. You might make the playoffs, but really, can you do much more than that?

That's why it's more realistic to combine the pick, and even the #21 pick, with a player like Jefferson to make a big, team-altering trade. We all heard the Carmelo Anthony rumors this week, and frankly, while we think he's a question mark coming to New Jersey, there's no denying that he's got serious talent and it would definitely qualify as shaking up the franchise. But, could he be a good soldier here?

Now that we know who has what draft picks, let the trade discussions begin. Do the Nets keep the pick 0r package it like the did on draft night 2001, bringing in Jefferson, Jason Collins and Brandon Armstrong for Eddie Griffin? Things will now start to get interesting.

OK, I'm on record - at #10, I'm ok if Thorn decides to keep the pick, but I would much rather see him move it on for other players to hasten the rebuilding.

More to come, obviously, since the names being floated about (Boris Diaw, 'Melo, Marcus Camby) are more than enough to get our attention.

Stay tuned.

-Joe

Draft Of Confusion

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Sat, 17 May 2008 12:32:00 +0000

Tuesday's the day the lottery Nets find out their fate. Don't expect them to win a 1, 2, or 3 draft slot, but hey, you never know, as the New York State Lottery commercials go.

So let's suppose the Nets are drafting out of a mid-level (say #10) spot. Who would be there for the Nets to take? And more importantly, will the pick remain the Nets pick, or will it be moved for a player or players to hasten the rebuilding effort?

If you consult the Mock Drafts around the internet, well, there are never any definitives, but mostly they say the Nets will grab a big man. Let's hope there isn't an Ed O'Bannon in there somewhere.

Right now, the leader in the Mock clubhouse is a 6' 11" freshman forward from LSU named Anthony Randolph. He's said to have a world of talent, but he's skinny, he lacks fundamentals and he's got issues with shot selection. Does this sound like the kind of project that Rod and Kiki would want (actually, it does sound like Kiki, strangely enough - perhaps Kiki thinks he can train him to be the next Dirk Nowitzki).

Another favorite seems to be DeAndre Jordan from Texas A&M, a 7' 0" center. And again, he's a freshman with some of the same issues as Randolph. His upside comparison is Andrew Bynum, though, so that got my attention. Another good athlete who could be boom or bust (but really, that seems like most of the players in this draft).

How about a foreigner, G/F Nicolas Batum from France and the Euroleague? He's 6' 8" and he's been compared to Rudy Gay, with plenty of upside. Sound like the wing player the Nets need?

What about a point guard? You can find 5' 11" sophomore from Texas DJ Augustin on a few lists as well. That would allow the Nets to trade Marcus Williams, but any time you give me a PG that's 5' 11", well, I get the jitters...

Or my current favorite, UCLA freshman F Kevin Love. This 6' 9" brute with the high basketball IQ is not only talented, but fun to watch. He's a big who doesn't make any news or highlights, but just plays the damned game. Isn't it time for someone like that?

Other top nominees for the #21 pick (from the Mavs) include sophomore Marreese Speights, a 6' 10" F/C from Florida, Georgetown's 7' 2" senior center Roy Hibbert, and 7' 0" C Robin Lopez from Stanford.

There's much more to come on this draft - certainly, there will be a world of changes to the Mock Drafts once the drafting positions are settled. Of course, the Nets always need toughness, a shooter, another lively big, and now perhaps even someone who can defend AND score. Who knows what changes lurk behind the minds of Rod Thorn and Kiki Vandeweghe?

It's all confusing right now, since the Nets could just as easily trade their top pick as use it.

Check in again after Tuesday.

-Joe

Cross River Expressway

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Wed, 14 May 2008 02:31:00 +0000

So the Knicks went out and hired (i.e. overpayed) Mike D'Antoni to coach that mess of a team across the river.

Hey, you have to start somewhere. Unfortunately, what you do with the players Mike inherits is another story entirely.

The Suns loved to push the ball, catch the defense on its heels, and take the first open shot possible. Defense was secondary, if not altogether unimportant. Can you see that working with the Knicks, and Stephon Marbury leading the charge? Eddie Curry hustling up the court to beat the defense? I don't think so.

In fact, the only players on that roster who are possibly able to play that way would be Jamal Crawford, Nate Robinson, Quentin Richardson (only because he once did, but he's damaged goods at this stage of the game), David Lee, and Wilson Pickett, or whatever that rookie's name is. That's not exactly a team to build around.

But maybe the Nets should take note that it'll be ok to run an offense in the East again. With all the slop that goes on in the East, it would actually be a refreshing change if the Knicks were able to bring the Suns style offense to New York.

As for the Nets, well, they can probably run that kind of offense better than the Knicks can right now, but they need to make sure they play defense. After all, no one wants them to regress any further than the 34 - 48 debacle we just witnessed.

But if the Nets are serious about rebuilding, and assuming they get stuck in the #10 spot in the draft that they currently inhabit (they apparently have a 1.1% chance of getting the top pick), they should seriously consider Kevin Love. While I'll get around to looking at the draft in the coming days ahead (JoeNetsfan.com's home base is getting set for a move, plus a new addition to the family, so things are really, really crazy in Joe's off-season right now), I'd love to say a few words about Love.

I think he'd be a great fit for the Nets. Let me lobby about that further, if they don't get a top three draft pick, then this guy ought to get serious consideration. Besides Rose and Beasley, what other game-breakers are in this draft? Excellent question, with a whole lot of different opinions for those who know. And if Tyler Hansbrough isn't coming out, then the Nets need some Love in their life.

Maybe things will perk up around here with D'Antoni in town. And while we feel sorry for Mark Jackson, who appears to have gotten a bit of a raw deal, we're actually glad that D'Antoni's coming east to the Big Apple to rebuild the cross river rivalry with a cross river expressway of an offense.

Let's just hope that Isiah Thomas' flawed pieces can be moved for some better ones.

Good luck, Donnie Walsh.

-Joe

Off Season Shenanigans

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Fri, 09 May 2008 02:35:00 +0000

Yes, it's been a fun playoff season (albeit one without the Nets), but so much else is happening related to Netsland...

1) Richard Jefferson charged in Minnesota for choking a patron at a hotel (in a private party) back in the winter. He says the story is all wrong, he didn't choke anyone. Sounds like RJ's telling the truth on this one, and someone's looking for a quick payday, especially when the poor choking victim is claiming that RJ "grabbed the victim by the throat with both hands and began to choke him and the victim went unconscious for a small amount of time." RJ says the dude was drunk and he's got witnesses.

I'm with RJ on this one until proven otherwise. Jason Kidd he ain't...

2) The Rat got another hurdle out of the way when a higher court refused to dismiss a lower court ruling that essentially clears the way for condemnation to begin. Nice try by those rag-tag band of windmill tilters, but unfortunately, the Rat's got everyone in New York that matters on his side, and though the slowing economy and the lawsuits have hit him deeply in the pocketbooks, he's still got the wherewithal to pull it off. At least we think he does. Yes, it makes sense for the arena in Brooklyn to not be built, for the Nets to move to Newark, and all to be right with the universe. But at this point, no one wins that scenario, unless Ratner sells the damned team. Sure, things could change (hey, where was Jon Corzine's support when we needed it?), but don't hold your breath, Netsfans. And remember, when the Nets finally move to Brooklyn, I'm outta here.

3). Rod Thorn gave Kiki Vanderweighe more money, and a title that makes him the heir apparent today. Smart move, Kiki appears to know basketball talent (sure, the Russian kid whose name no one can spell was a mistake, but Rod's made a few doozies himself), seems willing to put in the work, and is motivated to rebuild the franchise. God bless 'em. Now get to work, Kiki!

4). Read with interest the other day how Gana Diop said he'd be willing to stick around if the offer were right. Well, don't hold your breath on that one - don't you think Mr. Desperate To Win A Title won't lure him back to Dallas with more money that Rod Thorn thinks is prudent? Of course, since Rod doesn't like to overpay (really, nor can he) any one of his bench players. Wonder if he and Boki will bolt when they get the expected insulting offers from the Nets. As long as we don't go back to 2004....

5). The Knicks need a new coach, and it appears that Donnie Walsh is getting vapor lock with all the possibilities. The front runner apparently remains Mark Jackson, local boy without a lick of coaching experience, but smart and savvy enough to motivate today's players to play the game the right way. But Mike (What Have You Done For Me Lately) D'Antoni is suddenly being fire saled in Phoenix, and Avery Johnson, fresh off two straight playoff collapses, is also looking for work, so suddenly there are two prime candidates the Knicks can overpay for 35 wins. Gonna take a lot of work to fix that mess...And won't it be ironic if the Knicks pick another candidate altogether (like Tom Thibodeau, who may have himself another month before he's available).

Go Byron Scott's Hornets - as much as I love to watch the boring same-ness of Tim Duncan, don't you want the Hornets to make it all the way to the Finals? It's been great basketball to watch.

OK, we're gonna look at the draft this weekend, no telling what we'll find there.

Back to your regularly scheduled off-season.

-Joe

Put It To Rest

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Thu, 01 May 2008 00:37:00 +0000

We can finally put the Jason Kidd era to rest, Netsfans, after his team was soundly bounced by the team whose coach he once ran out of town, and a point guard who made him look so very old. Congrats go to Byron Scott, Chris Paul and the Hornets, who knocked the Kidd-led Mavs very easily out of the playoffs, Avery Johnson out of a job, and Mark Cuban out of his mind. Talk about a trade going bad.

Of course, the Nets got the better of the trade, with Devin Harris, Gana Diop, Trenton Hassell and Mo Ager, plus two first round picks, even if the Nets never even made it to the playoffs. They got younger, and a potential PG for the future in Harris, while the Mavs just got older and further over the salary cap. All of that for a first round exit.

Maybe the Mavs can build around Antoine Wright...

In any case, now there is closure in Netsland. A 35 year old savior to a franchise who didn't want to be in New Jersey anymore because the Nets didn't have enough talent to contend didn't fare much better with a team that did have talent. And now, looking older and slower and potentially without much talent on his team, the Kidd chance for a title appears all but dead. So if he couldn't win one in Jersey, and he can't win one in Dallas, then I'd say we have closure.

Kidd meant a ton to this franchise, gave it respect and something to watch night in and night out (even if not too many people actually did), and took the spotlight away from the wretched Knicks for at least 5 years. We owe him no small debt of thanks for making the Nets relevant, even if they look like they have the potential to slip back into irrelevance in the post-Kidd era.

Rod Thorn/Kiki Vanderweighe, it's all up to you to put this franchise back on the NBA map. A lot depends on what happens this off-season, and it's no guarantee that the Nets can improve behind Harris. But we're willing to take that chance, since Harris seems to want to be here, even if it means rebuilding.

As Kidd heads for yet another early vacation, let's thank him for the run, and then drop the matter entirely, at least for the summer months.

On to other matters, it's been a good start to this year's playoffs, exciting games even as some of the series are a bit one sided. Congrats to the Lakers, Spurs, Hornets and Magic, who have already closed out their series. It's likely to be major changes for the Nuggets, Suns and Mavs (and potentially the Raptors) for underperformance and some lack of unity amongst those teams. Looking like a Spurs/Lakers Western Conference Final at this point...

But how about those Hawks, who fell behind 2 - 0, then rallied to win both games in Atlanta against the mighty Celtics, who were all but anointed the Eastern Conference crown? It's been a great series, and great for the NBA, to see the lowest of the low hang tough with the high and mighty. While I don't think it will happen, I would love for the Celtics to breeze through the regular season, then go out in the first round. Wouldn't that expose Doc Rivers...

How do you explain the Pistons allowing the Sixers to be in their series? They fell down 2 - 1 before they woke up and decided to start playing, which is a bad omen for Piston fans. Could be we have a surprise or two in the East, with the Celtics sputtering and the Pistons not exactly up to form. If you expect the Magic (who are already in the next round) and the Cavs to advance as well (they blew a chance to close out the Wiz tonight), don't be surprised if the team that represents the East is not the favorite going into the playoffs. Lord help us, I hope it's not the Cavs again.

Congrats to Byron Scott and the Hornets, a fun, exciting team to watch (remind you of anything...).

Pat Riley's stepping down as Heat coach - something he should have done long ago. Oh wait, that's right, he threw a good coach, Stan Van Gundy, under the bus and took back the coaching job he had quit once before. Let's hope this time it sticks, because a 15 win season, chasing Shaq out of town after all he'd done for Riles, and going out scouting college when coaching is no longer interesting is not something I'd want in my coach.

And Avery Johnson got the boot today as well from Mark Cuban. This one appears to be even more deserved, since he's been outclassed in the coaching department for two straight playoffs, and seems to have motivated his players into wishing he were elsewhere. Perhaps Kidd most of all. For all the talk of the guy's ability to motivate his players, it turns out his bully pulpit wasn't nearly enough to save him when he was exposed as a bad game manager. Maybe Cuban will now go out and get a coach with some experience.

Of course, Johnson's name is already linked to the Knicks, which would be yet another delicious irony. I would think that Donnie Walsh isn't that stupid, but...

Where does that leave Lawrence Frank? He surely did just as good a job coaching as is Riley or Johnson this season, right? Well, aside from being on the hot seat (more like lukewarm, probably), Frank needs to figure out this off-season why he couldn't motivate his team to get on the same page, play defense, or at least pretend to. He also needs to figure out how to develop a younger player or two, and perhaps stop being so loyal to guys who don't hold up their end of the deal on the court. It will be interesting to hear what changes he's made, both to the Nets and his coaching style, when September rolls around.

We'll take a look at the draft prospects tomorrow, but for now, that's enough NBA.

-Joe

Last Laugh?

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:33:00 +0000

Well, that whole Jason Kidd thing sure is working out, huh Mark Cuban?

Just finished watching Chris Paul destroy Kidd and the Hornets - think Avery Johnson will have a job for long after this one? Never say never, but the Mavs look dead in the water, with a second straight first round exit awaiting them. Poor Dirk, he's searching desperately for help, and the guy with the best credentials for playoff stress is playing horribly.

Kind of hard to root for Byron Scott over Kidd, but hey, he's earned the delicious irony that is beating Kidd after Kidd ran him out of town...

In other playoff series, nice job of quitting while ahead by the Pistons on Sunday. Surprising Sixers continue to get it done without any superstars and well known faces.

The Lakers cruised, no surprise.

The Cavs are up 2- 0 over the Wiz, who are playing worse with the return of Gilbert Arenas from injury. Somehow, I don't think that's going to help his case (or Eddie Jordan's) when it comes to sticking around next season.

The Spurs won a marathon against the high scoring marathon experts, and how bizarre is it that Tim Duncan drops a three to send the game into 2OT? That Spurs team is the best at making something out of nothing, for about a decade now.

No real surprises in the Celtics win over the too young to understand Hawks. The balance that team shows is incredible.

The Jazz have the Rockets number. And you can write it down - Tracy McGrady, for all his talent, isn't a guy who wins a championship, or a guy you build a team around. He's like his cousin Vince Carter - good support player, comes up small when it really matters.

The Magic appear to be in firm control against the Raptors after a tight one point win tonight. The Raptors need to get rid of Sam Mitchell if they get bounced in the first round again, no excuses. Of course, deep down it's very satisfying to watch the collapse in the post season.

Overall, though - it's been a good start to the NBA postseason. Here's hoping it continues to keep my interest going, to distract all the sins that need correcting on the Nets roster this offseason.

-Joe

Final Grades For One And All

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:25:00 +0000

Well Netsfans, it's time for that time-honored tradition of handing out end of season grades - a process that comes far earlier than any other time we've done this since 2001. It was a shame the Nets didn't make the playoffs after such high expectations in training camp, but then again, we should have seen the signs early and often. Of course, we were hoping the Jason Kidd wanting to be traded angle was just a nasty rumor (like the one about RJ being gay last season), but alas, it was all true, and the season just turned out to be one big lie.

We'll get over it, of course, and move on with future Net endeavors, but not before putting the final nail in the coffin with the grades. I hope you approve.

Vince Carter: Grade - B
I hope you cut me (and Vince) a bit of slack here. He started off the season hurt, saw his averages drop dramatically, and seemed to have lost a step or three, and with it, the ability to challenge the defense. But he recovered nicely after healing (and I would say after Kidd took his mind games to Dallas), averaging some startlingly strong numbers in addition to scoring and showing some maturity on the court.

Richard Jefferson: Grade - B
Started off terrific but tailed towards the end, at least offensively. He found himself a Top 10 NBA scorer, but with that came a lack of defensive responsibility that seemed to more than outweigh his offensive contributions most nights. Without RJ shutting down the opponent's scorer, the Nets were often dead in the water since no one else played much defense either. He might be a goner, but that contract of his is pretty significant for a second or third banana.

Devin Harris: Grade - B
He wasn't around all season, so he didn't have the luxury of playing the game at full speed while knowing where his teammates could always been found on the court. Still, he's got burners on his legs, and he's a better shooter than anyone realized. He can create havoc on both sides of the ball, and he appears willing to initiate contact, which makes him that much more valuable. Just don't count on double digit assists nightly.

Josh Boone: Grade - B-
He wasn't expected to contribute much, and wound up being their best big man up front for much of the season. He was strong rebounding and finishing on the pick and roll, and he'll block a shot and play some defense. He still struggles with the better bigs, however, and he needs to get stronger and find a consistent jump shot. Maybe he's best coming off the bench, but if he's here and he's healthy, he's got a role next season.

Nenad Krstic: Grade- C-
He probably deserves an incomplete, because we didn't see much of the old Krstic. He struggled with his conditioning and his mental approach, so he came back and then disappeared for much of the season. His shot and footspeed needed work, but he lacked consistency because he couldn't put in the work he needed to until after the new year. He's a restricted free agent who could fit in next season, and be a godsend if he returns to his old form.

Boki Nachbar: Grade - C-
Boki was very inconsistent (or perhaps, consistent in his inconsistency, like the rest of the team) - when his shot was falling, or he was making things happen, he was good. But when the shot wasn't falling, he contributed next to nothing. Struggled with some injuries as well, but he was being counted on to be the lead scorer off the bench, and too often he was anything but. He's a free agent, but we'll see if the Nets can afford to bring him back.

Marcus Williams: Grade - D.
I'm probably going easy on Marcus, for all the mistakes and the glaring lack of defense that he plays, he may well deserve an F. He lost time to the injured foot at the start of the season, then seemed to forget anything he'd learned and wound up looking worse than in his rookie year. He's not a pass-first point, but too many times this season his shot selection was highly questionable, and when the shots didn't fall, his already non-existant defense got worse. He may not be around next season.

Gana Diop: Grade - C
He came in the Kidd trade, and he proved early on that he can rebound and defend the paint, something no one else seemed capable of doing this season. But he's no offensive whiz, and when he's in the game, often the Nets are playing 4 on 5 offensively. He does what he does pretty well, though, so he'll be highly regarded this off-season.

Sean Williams: Grade - C-
He's got the athleticism but not the head for the NBA game, yet. He found himself briefly a starter, and his energy was contageous, his shot blocking skills outrageous. But he couldn't seem to grasp what the Nets were trying to do, so by the end of the season, he was riding the pine. Although I ask, defensively, what Net was grasping what they were trying to do? He's got a lot more work ahead of him.

Darrell Armstrong: Grade - B
He gets a B for his enthusiasm alone. Great, positive influence as the third PG, he saw spot duty when he saw it at all, and he had a few moments in the sun. But he's going to be 40, and isn't going to stick around for the rebuilding unless he joins the coaching staff.

Stromile Swift: Grade - C-
What in the world does this package of athleticism do when he hits the court? He had some shining moments, but he's also one who disappears at times, or worse, finds himself on the bench or in the doghouse because his play doesn't match up to his skills. He's got a player option for 2008 left on his contract, so unless the Nets can move him or his mistakenly opts out, look for more Stro next season.

Trenton Hassell: Grade - D
Plays defense. And that's about it. For that, he's probably highly overpaid, and after a brief glimpse of him when he first arrived from Dallas, that's not someone the Nets need next season, guaranteed contract or not.

Mo Ager: Grade - D
What can he do? Shoot some? Play any defense? Not sure, since his playing time was extremely limited, and mostly to garbage time at that. The Nets don't really need him except for practice play.

Keith Van Horn: Grade - Inc.
You can't grade a ghost, even one who again hit the lottery...

Lawrence Frank: Grade - D
Perhaps that's harsh, but this group of Nets was never able to find any chemistry. That falls on Frank just as much as the stupid losses to horrible teams does. If his job is to motivate, well, he failed on all counts, because he never could get this team to play defense either. What's left is enough to build upon, but if he can't get the Nets back to the playoffs, or worse, off to a decent start, then he'll be trying to hook on with another team as an assistant next year.

Rod Thorn: Grade - C+
We like Rod, after all, he's the guy that built this team from loserville into a 6 time playoff participant. But, he's been spotty with his personnel moves of late, from signing Jamal Magloire to drafting Antoine Wright to bringing in Alonzo Mourning, but he redeemed himself by prying Harris away from the Mavs for Kidd. A very critical off-season will likely cement his legacy or condemn it.

Who Should Stay And Who Should Go

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:17:00 +0000

Wrapping up the season with a back-to-back Tuesday and Wednesday - first the Bobcats in the last home game of the season, and then the Celtics in a game that hardly matters for anyone except those on the end of the bench. Expect to see a lot of Brian Scalabrine (if he's active, or not hurt...).

See that Nets attendance is down 6% - hardly surprising what was served up on the court, and the never-ending storm of economic news to the bad. Oh, and a whole lot of mystery over whether the Brooklyn thing is going to happen any time soon...

But fear not, friends, soon you can slip on your flip flops and glide into summer, where expectations for the fall and winter and spring are hatched in the positive rays of the summer sunshine. Or so it seems...

With the off-season already here, no way to press onward through the playoffs, and a whole lot of necessary change in the offing, it's time to start talking about who should stay and who should go on the Nets' roster. It's clear that there is little chemistry with the current bunch, no toughness, and not enough shooting to get through a successful NBA season in 2008 - 2009. It's also pretty clear that there isn't enough difference in the games of Richard Jefferson and Vince Carter that doesn't make one (or who knows? both?) expendable. With Jason Kidd gone, the strengths of both RJ and VC are a bit of a duplication, and all that seems to have happened is RJ suddenly turned into a bad defensive player. Not good for any hopes of future success.

So with that in mind we'll start whacking around the roster and talk about who should be here next season. I've given it a lot of thought over the last week or so (and trust me, I've had a lot of time to think), and without going in to who should replace those going, what trades should be made or who should be drafted (we'll save that for after the regular season ends), here is what I've come up with:

Should stay a Net:

Vince Carter (because he's got a big contract and the owner loves him)
Devin Harris (you don't trade a legend for the kid and then not give him a chance to pilot the team over a full season)
Josh Boone (maybe he's not a starter, but a good energy/rebounder/pick and roll player off the bench)
Sean Williams (it's far too early to give up on him, unless there is something serious that we're missing)
Gana Diop (I think he brings something to the Nets that the need - interior defense, shot blocking and rebounding, plus he might bring some toughness)

Should NOT stay a Net:

Richard Jefferson (if you can move him with the rather large contract, he's probably the best asset the Nets have to get another player - Elton Brand?)
Marcus Williams (perhaps he needs another team/coach to bring out the best in him, but he's taken a step or three backwards this year)
Stromile Swift (maybe there's something here, but he just doesn't seem like a Lawrence Frank type of player, since you can't trust him to play defense consistently)
Trenton Hassell (I was all for him at first, since he actually plays defense, but now? Well, perhaps he's best moving on)
Mo Ager (Maybe there's something here, like a shooter, but the Nets can't afford to wait and find out unless they want to stash him as player #13)
Darrell Armstrong (retire, friend)
Keith Van Horn (stay in retirement, friend)

On the Bubble:

Nenad Krstic (he's proven to be slower to gain his old form, but then again, can we expect he'll ever get it back? He's a risk until proven otherwise, one dimensional on a team that is currently full of them. Without a Jason Collins to cover for him, I'm not sure the Nets can afford the luxury)
Boki Nachbar - (when he's on, he can be game-changing, but he's really inconsistent, which the Nets don't need. Willing to play hurt a plus, unless someone makes a large offer, they should probably keep him around)

Those are my thoughts. I'll get more into the hows and whys of my thinking over the course of the next week or so, and I'm open to anyone convincing me the error of my thinking ways. Drop me a line and let me know your thoughts, because this is the first time in seven years we're facing the challenge of rebuilding almost from the ground up.

-Joe

Done. Over. Finito. The End. Good Bye.

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:40:00 +0000

The Nets are out of the playoffs!

Frankly, I couldn't be happier for this season to end as quickly as possible. It's been painful to the point of not wanting to watch and report on anything going on. Think we all need a vacation.

I have not yet seen the game, but saw the final score - Raptors 113, Nets 85. I think when I turned it on in the third quarter it was something like Raptors 60, Nets 56, so it appears another complete second half collapse was the order of the day. That shows a team in total retreat, unable to stop it's spiral downward.

They say you have to hit bottom to start coming back up again. I think the Nets have 3 more games to do just that.

It will be an interesting off-season, one hopes a complete changeover is in order.

Blow it up, what could it hurt. Some different faces and playing styles (play fast and loose - oh, that's right - the coach can't allow that. Play young than - oh wait, that's a no-no too) might bring some joy back to a franchise that seems to have had it sucked out of it by Jason Kidd (and to be fair, he put the fun into it back in 2001).

I'll get the game review up tomorrow morning after I watch what I can stomach of the tape of the game. Just can't wait for Wednesday night, that's all I can say.

-Joe

Good Thing It's Almost Over

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:52:00 +0000

What a turnaround, from a 14 point lead to absolute oblivion, all in a half hour against the Cavs tonight.

All I can say is, a new low has been reached. Officially, I would say the off-season has started, even if the Nets are still mathematically in the playoff hunt. That magic number to a long off-season is down to one.

This was a debacle. I came home late and turned the game on as the Nets were cresting to a 14 point third quarter lead. The Cavs looked dead and lifeless, while the Nets looked confident. And on a dime, it turned, with Daniel Gibson suddenly pushing the pace, and LeBron taking over despite the bad back.

The fourth quarter had the Nets looking like zombies, making exactly one field goal, and turning a one point game into a 21 point blowout faster than you can say "fire Lawrence Frank".

For all the talk of still playing hard (and to be fair, I missed two and a half quarters of this one), the Nets looked like they laid down and died. They must have missed 10 baskets from close to point blank range, and suddenly didn't have the energy to get the ball all the way to the basket.

Oh, this was a new low all right.

I'll get a game review up tomorrow night (yep, on a plane by 8AM, home by 8PM), but at this point, what else is there to say really but thank goodness it's almost over.

A total makeover should be in the works, if it isn't already, because there is no way I could stand another season with the exact same cast of characters we have now.

I'll give you my list of players who should stay later this week. I'd love to hear yours.

Peace, Netsfans - go get some sleep.

Joe

Hot Topics

noreply@blogger.com (Joe Netsfan) — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:30:00 +0000

The Pistons on the road...then the Raptors at home...then three straight on the road, starting with the Cavs...

Sounds like the impossible dream to me, having to win these next 5 (and really, the remaining 7) and hope that Atlanta stumbles. Hey, the Nets had their chances...but that early stumble with all the home losses, then the 9 game streak, and well, here we are.

Just take a look at the month by month records for a second:

October/November: 7 - 8, but only 3 - 6 at home (they beat Philly, Portland and the Lakers on the road, but couldn't beat the Heat or the Grizz at home)

December: 7 - 8, but only 4 - 5 at home (that makes 7 - 11 at home in the first two months - losses to the Knicks, Clippers and Kings at home).

January: 5 - 10, but 3 - 3 at home (this was the month of the big swing towards the road losses, part of the 9 game losing streak that pretty much killed the Nets)

February: 7 - 6, the only winning month of the season (and the Nets were 5 - 2 at home)

March: 5 - 11 (4 - 3 at home, which means a 1 - 8 on the road).

April: 0 - 1 thus far with 7 games to play

The biggest winning streak was 5 games, spanning December and January (and including the surprising knockout of the Magic in Orlando). That was with Jason Kidd all but on his way out the door, and with an upcoming 9 game losing streak not 3 weeks later.

So we expect the Nets to run the table now? Since Devin Harris took over, the Nets have not won more than 2 straight games in more than a month. And they absolutely cannot win on the road (the Nets are 1 - 8 0n the road since Harris took control, with the Knicks being the only victims).

What makes this a hot topic, anyway? Just from the standpoint that it is what it is - the Nets can't control what's already occured (giving games away that matter now) and they can't get out of their own way with everything on the line.

It's a hot topic for the draft position they get if they don't make it.

And it's important for Netsfans to come to terms with the end of an era - 6 straight years of playoff basketball.

Why not give Marcus Williams and Sean Williams more playing time and see what occurs? Yes, theoretically they are still in it, but if Atlanta wins the first game of a home and home with the Sixers, well, let 'em loose. There is lots to figure out for next season.

Why don't Stromile Swift and Trenton Hassell play more? Dave D said it's because Lawrence Frank wants to win. If that's the case, he's sure got a funny way of showing it. And that just means that there is likely no place on the team for Swift, Hassell or Mo Ager next season as long as Frank is around.

Detroit is next - they might be beatable if they're starting to rest their key players and the Nets go all out, but then again Detroit's subs could whip the Nets first team right now, at least defensively.

Last hot topic - since we're likely going to be at the end of the season with no playoffs, it's time to start thinking about what changes should be made. I know that many of you will say "Fire Frank", and it's getting harder to argue against that by the day, but what do the Nets need to do now that the future suddenly is now? Let me know some thoughts - try to keep them realistic.

Joe